Isreal Kochheiser: If you are amid folks who want to create a new construction and you want to become a designer you must search here https://tr.im/IXLHv and make use of the tips contained in the Ideas 4 Landscaping guidebook.With Ideas 4 Landscaping guidebook you will not only get the landscape that you want but also permit you to invest quality time with your loved ones due to the fact every person will grew to become concerned with your landscape taskIf you want an outdoor area functional and stunning, but you do not have reserved a spending budget for a skilled landscaping then this manual will be your greatest buddy....Show more
Nadia Crauswell: No is a bit brutal, you can take a landscape with any lens if you want to. However, if you want a nice wide picture, you will need a wide angle lens. We don't know what camera you have. If you have film, the 50mm is a standard lens, or normal lens. 35mm or 28mm would be good for landscape. If your camera is a digi! tal, regardless of which brand of SLR, your 50mm lens is more of a portrait lens - you will have to stand a bit further back to take a picture and thus your subject will not look like a reflection in an old Buick hubcap. ...Show more
Connie Dickirson: You could take a landscape pic with it. I really prefer a 40mm lens instead.
Patricia Bolduc: For landscapes you'll want to use a wide angle lense (somewhere between 21 to 35mm on a full frame).A 50mm lens on a full frame is good for streets and documentary.
Barrett Felicia: 1
Jefferson Sarson: Not really... you want a wide-angle lens or fisheye lens for landscape panoramic shots.
Marylee Lucks: It all depends on what you are taking a picture of. If the picture is say a bridge and the 50mm will fill the bridge in the frame then yes it would be fine. But for general use of landscape shots then its like what the others say. Wider is better. I have to say, I had a bit of a surprise with my 5! 0 mm prime over Thanksgiving. I was taking some night shots ! of the Arthur Ravenel Bridge in Charleston SC using my 24-105mm L lens. Then just for fun I switched to my 50 mm prime 1.4 lens. The 50 mm lens did a much better job. The colors coming off the water were breath taking, where as using the 24-105 lens the water just showed swirls, kind of like what you see when taking shots of waterfalls. But there was no light reflection with the 24-105 lens. These were 30 second shots at night....Show more
Robt Betker: About the only thing focal length alters is how far away from the subject you are. The longer the focal length the further away you are for the same 'framing'. I say 'about' as there is one other consideration which is distortion, a 50mm is probably as wide as you want to go used anything like close up, or you'll get exaggerated perspective (huge noses and chins). Another consideration is aperture, the wider the aperture to narrower the DOF, this can be used to throw the background out of focus. which is very ! useful. I tend to work well away from my subjects, my favourite lens for portraits is my 70 - 200mm f2.8 Sigma lens which I find ideal, my other favourite is a 'nifty fifty' a 50mm f 1.4 with this 'selective focusing' is easy and being a prime lens image quality is superb too. As you also mention Macro, don't forget that a 50mm or (preferably) 100mm f2.8 also makes a good portrait lens the fact that it can focus really close when required is a bonus. I favour the 100mm for this at maximum you can get a 1:1 ratio with either lens (life-size - something 1cm in the 'real' world is 1cm on your sensor) at this 1:1 the 50mm will put you around 2 Inches from the subject, a 100mm about 8 Inches, with the 50mm you can get into your own light and bugs fly away, at 100mm you have more to get light in and bugs don't get frightened by your presence and tend to stay. Chris...Show more
No comments:
Post a Comment